No problem, David, but I believe that creating new names like that will make everything even more complicated and less precise. I agree, some names are rather cumbersome, like Paeonia mlokosewitschii, which is quite a handfull, but at least there is no doubt which plant you are talking about. This forum is after all not only for a few members with their own lingo, but anybody out there looking for information about a specific plant should be able to get a hit also at this site, which they would not if we created our own nomenclature.
There is always a discussion if the Latin names should be dropped, some seem to think it is just snobbishness and a way to create a distance to 'ordinary people'. Coming from a country with four million people and not having English as my mother tongue, I can assure you that the scientific names make it much easier for us when we try to communicate in another language. I have no problems generally using my own language when I speak to Swedes and Danes, but when it comes to names of birds and plants, most of them are completely different. Even in my own country I sometimes have problems, we have two official languages (plus Sami, which I don't understand at all), and more dialects than you can imagine, even here Latin names are sometimes very useful.